Ohio Legal Ethics
Prepared By
Jones Day
and
Arthur F. Greenbaum
James W. Shocknessy Professor of Law
Ohio State University College of Law
This summary of the law of lawyering of Ohio has been prepared by Marc L. Swartzbaugh and Brian F. Toohey, of the firm of Jones Day, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, and by Professor Arthur F. Greenbaum, The Ohio State University, College of Law, (614) 292-4160. Substantial portions of the summary have been excerpted and adapted from Professor Greenbaum's treatise, LAWYER'S GUIDE TO THE OHIO CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY (Banks-Baldwin/West 1996). The summary is transmitted for informational purposes only and not for legal advice. Users should not act upon this information without seeking the professional advice of a lawyer in the applicable jurisdiction. An effort has been made to provide useful information, but the information is not necessarily complete, may be inaccurate, and may not reflect current legal developments. The provider does not warrant that the information is complete or accurate and disclaims all liability to any person for any loss caused by errors or omissions in the summary.
Suggestions for improvements or correction are welcome. Please send them to: Marc L. Swartzbaugh, Jones Day, 901 Lakeside Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44114, Tel: 216-586-7242, Fax: 216-579-0212, E-mail: mswartzbaugh@jonesday.com
Copyright in this narrative is held by Jones Day. Copyright in LAWYER'S GUIDE TO THE OHIO CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY is held by the Banks-Baldwin Law Publishing Company, a West Publishing Affiliated Company. Copyright in the full American Legal Ethics Library is held by Cornell University. Questions about redistribution of the library should be directed to: Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, Myron Taylor Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853. E-mail: lii@lii.law.cornell.edu
The cutoff date for this edition is December 2008. Consequently, the narrative does not reflect decisions, amendments or other legal developments after that date.
INTRODUCTION
- 0.1:100 Sources
of Law and Guidance
- 0.2:200 Forms
of Lawyer Regulation in Ohio
- 0.3:300 Organization
of This Library and the Model Rules
- 0.4:400 Abbreviations,
References and Terminology
- 0.4:500 Additional
Definitions in Ohio
I. Client-lawyer relationship
- 1.1
Rule 1.1 Competence
- 1.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.1:200
Disciplinary Standard of Competence
- 1.1:300
Malpractice Liability
- 1.1:400
Liability to Certain Nonclients
- 1.1:500
Defenses and Exceptions to Liability
- 1.1:600
Vicarious Liability [see 5.1:500]
- 1.2 Rule 1.2 Scope
of Representation
- 1.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.2:200
Creating the Client-Lawyer Relationship
- 1.2:300
Authority to Make Decisions or Act for Client
- 1.2:400
Lawyer's Moral Autonomy
- 1.2:500
Limiting the Scope of the Representation
- 1.2:600
Prohibited Assistance
- 1.2:700
Warning Client of Limitations on Representation
- 1.2:800
Identifying to Whom a Lawyer Owes Duties
- 1.2:900 Threatening Prosecution
- 1.3 Rule 1.3 Diligence
- 1.4 Rule 1.4 Communication
- 1.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.4:200
Duty to Communicate with Client
- 1.4:300
Duty to Consult with Client
- 1.4:400
Duty to Inform the Client of Settlement Offers
- 1.4:500 Duty to Inform Client of Lack of Malpractice Insurance
- 1.5 Rule 1.5 Fees
and Expenses
- 1.5:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.5:200
A Lawyer's Claim to Compensation
- 1.5:300
Attorney-Fee Awards (Fee Shifting)
- 1.5:400
Reasonableness of a Fee Agreement
- 1.5:500
Communication Regarding Fees
- 1.5:600
Contingent Fees
- 1.5:700
Unlawful Fees
- 1.5:800
Fee Splitting (Referral Fees)
- 1.6 Rule 1.6 Confidentiality
of Information
- 1.6:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.6:200
Professional Duty of Confidentiality
- 1.6:300
Exceptions to Duty of Confidentiality--In General
- 1.6:400
Attorney-Client Privilege
- 1.6:500
Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege
- 1.6:600
Exceptions to Attorney-Client Privilege
- 1.6:700
Lawyer Work-Product Immunity
- 1.7 Rule 1.7 Conflict
of Interest: General Rule
- 1.7:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.7:200
Conflicts of Interest in General
- 1.7:300
Conflict of Interest Among Current Clients
- 1.7:400
Conflict of Interest Between Current Client and Third-Party Payor
- 1.7:500
Conflict of Interest Between Current Client and Lawyer's Interest [see
also 1.8:200-:220, :1000]]
- 1.8 Rule 1.8 Conflict
of Interest: Prohibited Transactions
- 1.8:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.8:200
Lawyer's Personal Interest Affecting Relationship
- 1.8:300
Lawyer's Use of Client Information
- 1.8:400
Client Gifts to Lawyer
- 1.8:500
Literary or Media Rights Relating to Representation
- 1.8:600
Financing Litigation
- 1.8:700
Payment of Lawyer's Fee by Third Person
- 1.8:800
Aggregate Settlements
- 1.8:900
Agreements Involving Lawyer's Malpractice Liability
- 1.8:1000
Opposing a Lawyer Relative
- 1.8:1100
Lawyer's Proprietary Interest in Subject Matter of Representation
- 1.8:1200 Imputation of (a) through (i) Prohibitions to Other Members of Firm
- 1.9 Rule 1.9 Duties to Former Clients
- 1.9:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.9:200
Representation Adverse to Interest of Former Client--In General
- 1.9:300
Client of Lawyer's Former Firm
- 1.9:400
Use or Disclosure of Former Client's Confidences
- 1.10 Rule 1.10
Imputation of Conflict of Interest: General Rule
- 1.10:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.10:200
Imputed Disqualification Among Current Affiliated Lawyers
- 1.10:300
Removing Imputation by Screening
- 1.10:400
Disqualification of Firm After Disqualified Lawyer Departs
- 1.10:500
Client Consent [see also 1.7:240 and 1.9:200]
- 1.10:600
Imputed Disqualification of Former or Current Government Lawyers
- 1.11 Rule 1.11
Special Conflicts of Interest for Former and Current Government Officers and Employees
- 1.11:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.11:200
Representation of Another Client by Former Government Lawyer
- 1.11:300
Use of Confidential Government Information
- 1.11:400
Government Lawyer Participation in Matters Related to Prior Representation
- 1.11:500
Government Lawyer Negotiating for Private Employment
- 1.12 Rule 1.12
Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator, or Other Third-Party Neutral
- 1.12:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.12:200
Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator, or Other Third-Party Neutral Representing Client in Same Matter
- 1.12:300
Negotiating for Future Employment
- 1.12:400
Screening to Prevent Imputed Disqualification
- 1.12:500
Partisan Arbitrators Selected by Parties to Dispute
- 1.13 Rule 1.13
Organization as Client
- 1.13:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.13:200
Entity as Client
- 1.13:300
Preventing Injury to an Entity Client
- 1.13:400
Fairness to Nonclient Constituents Within an Entity Client
- 1.13:500
Joint Representation of Entity and Individual Constituents
- 1.14 Rule 1.14
Client with Diminished Capacity
- 1.14:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.14:200
Problems in Representing a Partially or Severely Disabled Client
- 1.14:300
Maintaining Client-Lawyer Relationship with Disabled Client
- 1.14:400
Appointment of Guardian or Other Protective Action
- 1.14:500 Confidentiality Issues
- 1.15 Rule 1.15
Safekeeping Funds and Property
- 1.15:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.15:200
Safeguarding and Safekeeping Property
- 1.15:300
Holding Money as a Fiduciary for the Benefit of Clients or Third Parties
- 1.15:400
Dispute Over Lawyer's Entitlement to Funds Held in Trust
- 1.15:500 Fiduciary Duties Upon Dissolution of Law Firm
- 1.15:600 Obligations on Sale of Law Practice
- 1.15:700 Further Safekeeping Obligations
- 1.16 Rule 1.16
Declining or Terminating Representation
- 1.16:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.16:200
Mandatory Declination or Withdrawal
- 1.16:300
Permissive Withdrawal
- 1.16:400
Obtaining Permission to Withdraw Under Local Rule of Tribunal
- 1.16:500
Mitigating Harm to Client Upon Withdrawal
- 1.16:600
Fees on Termination
- 1.17 Rule 1.17
Sale of Law Practice
- 1.17:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.17:200
Traditional Rule Against the Sale of a Law Practice
- 1.17:300
Problems in Sale of Practice
- 1.18 Rule 1.18
Duties to Prospective Client
- 1.18:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 1.18:200
Duties to Prospective Client
II. COUNSELOR
- 2.1 Rule 2.1 Advisor
- 2.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 2.1:200
Exercise of Independent Judgment
- 2.1:300
Non-Legal Factors in Giving Advice
- 2.2 Rule 2.2 Intermediary
- 2.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 2.2:200
Relationship of Intermediation to Joint Representation
- 2.2:300
Preconditions to Becoming an Intermediary
- 2.2:400
Communication During Intermediation
- 2.2:500
Consequences of a Failed Intermediation
- 2.3 Rule 2.3 Evaluation
for Use by Third Persons
- 2.3:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 2.3:200
Undertaking an Evaluation for a Client
- 2.3:300
Duty to Third Persons Who Rely on Lawyer's Opinion
- 2.3:400
Confidentiality of an Evaluation
- 2.4 Rule 2.4 Lawyer
Serving as Arbitrator, Mediator, or Third-Party Neutral
- 2.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 2.4:200
Obligations of Third-Party Neutral
III. ADVOCATE
- 3.1 Rule 3.1 Meritorious
Claims and Contentions
- 3.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.1:200
Non-Meritorious Assertions in Litigation
- 3.1:300
Judicial Sanctions for Abusive Litigation Practice (Especially Rule
11)
- 3.1:400
Civil Liability for Abusive Litigation Practice [see also 1.1:520]
- 3.1:500
Complying with Law and Tribunal Rulings
- 3.2 Rule 3.2 Expediting
Litigation
- 3.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.2:200
Dilatory Tactics
- 3.2:300
Judicial Sanctions for Dilatory Tactics
- 3.3 Rule 3.3 Candor
Toward the Tribunal
- 3.3:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.3:200
False Statements to a Tribunal
- 3.3:300
Disclosing Adverse Legal Authority
- 3.3:400
Offering False Evidence
- 3.3:500
Remedial Measures Necessary to Correct False Evidence
- 3.3:600
Discretion to Withhold Evidence Believed To Be False
- 3.3:700
Duty to Remedy Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct Related to Adjudicative Proceeding
- 3.3:800
Duty of Disclosure in Ex Parte Proceedings
- 3.4 Rule 3.4 Fairness
to Opposing Party and Counsel
- 3.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.4:200
Unlawful Destruction and Concealment of Evidence
- 3.4:300
Falsifying Evidence
- 3.4:400
Knowing Disobedience to Rules of Tribunal
- 3.4:500
Fairness in Pretrial Practice
- 3.4:600
Improper Trial Tactics
- 3.4:700
Advising Witness Not to Speak to Opposing Parties
- 3.4:800 Advising Potential Witness To Leave The Jurisdiction
- 3.5 Rule 3.5 Impartiality
and Decorum of the Tribunal
- 3.5:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.5:200
Improperly Influencing a Judge, Juror, or Other Court Official
- 3.5:300
Improper Ex Parte Communications
- 3.5:400
Conduct Disruptive of or Degrading to a Tribunal
- 3.5:500 Disclosure of Improper Conduct by or Toward a Juror
- 3.6 Rule 3.6 Trial Publicity
- 3.6:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.6:200
Improper Extrajudicial Statements
- 3.6:300
Permissible Statements
- 3.6:400
Responding to Adverse Publicity
- 3.7 Rule 3.7 Lawyer
as Witness
- 3.7:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.7:200
Prohibition of Advocate as Witness
- 3.7:300
An Affiliated Lawyer as Advocate (Imputed Disqualification)
- 3.7:400 The Advocate-Witness Rule and Government Lawyers
- 3.8 Rule 3.8 Special
Responsibilities of a Prosecutor
- 3.8:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.8:200
The Decision to Charge
- 3.8:300
Efforts to Assure Accused's Right to Counsel
- 3.8:400
Seeking Waivers of Rights from Unrepresented Defendants
- 3.8:500
Disclosing Evidence Favorable to the Accused
- 3.8:600
Monitoring Extrajudicial Statements by Law Enforcement Officials
- 3.8:700
Issuing a Subpoena to a Lawyer
- 3.8:800
Making Extrajudicial Statements
- 3.8:900
Peremptory Strikes of Jurors
- 3.9 Rule 3.9 Advocate
in Nonadjudicative Proceedings
- 3.9:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 3.9:200
Duties of Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings
IV. TRANSACTIONS
WITH PERSONS OTHER THAN CLIENTS
- 4.1 Rule 4.1 Truthfulness
in Statements to Others
- 4.2 Rule 4.2 Communication
with Person Represented by Counsel
- 4.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 4.2:200
Communication with a Represented Person
- 4.3 Rule 4.3 Dealing
with Unrepresented Person
- 4.3:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 4.3:200
Dealing with Unrepresented Person
- 4.4 Rule 4.4 Respect
for Rights of Third Persons
- 4.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 4.4:200
Disregard of Rights or Interests of Third Persons
V. LAW FIRMS
AND ASSOCIATIONS
- 5.1 Rule 5.1 Responsibilities
of Partners, Managers, and Supervisory Lawyers
- 5.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.1:200
Duty of Partners to Monitor Compliance with Professional Rules
- 5.1:300
Monitoring Duty of Supervising Lawyer
- 5.1:400
Failing to Rectify the Misconduct of a Subordinate Lawyer
- 5.1:500
Vicarious Liability of Partners
- 5.2 Rule 5.2 Responsibilities
of a Subordinate Lawyer
- 5.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.2:200
Independent Responsibility of a Subordinate Lawyer
- 5.2:300
Reliance on a Supervisory's Resolution of Ethical Issues
- 5.3 Rule 5.3 Responsibilities
Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants
- 5.3:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.3:200
Duty to Establish Safeguards
- 5.3:300
Duty to Control Nonlawyer Assistants
- 5.3:400
Responsibility for Misconduct of Nonlawyer Assistants
- 5.4 Rule 5.4 Professional
Independence of a Lawyer [Restrictions on Form of Practice]
- 5.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.4:200
Sharing Fees with a Nonlawyer
- 5.4:300
Forming a Partnership with Nonlawyers
- 5.4:400
Third Party Interference with a Lawyer's Professional Judgment
- 5.4:500
Nonlawyer Ownership or Control of Profit-Making Legal-Services Organizations
- 5.5 Rule 5.5 Unauthorized
Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law
- 5.5:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.5:200
Engaging in Unauthorized Practice
- 5.5:300
Unauthorized Practice in Ohio by Out-of-State Lawyers
- 5.5:400 Provision of Legal Services on Temporary Basis
- 5.5:500 Provision of Legal Services by Out-of-State Lawyers on Regular Basis
- 5.6 Rule 5.6 Restrictions
on Right to Practice
- 5.6:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.6:200
Restrictions on Lawyers Leaving a Firm
- 5.6:300
Settlements Restricting a Lawyer's Future Practice
- 5.7 Rule 5.7 Responsibilities
Regarding Law-Related Services
- 5.7:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 5.7:200
Applicability of Ethics Rules to Ancillary Business Activities
VI. PUBLIC
SERVICE
- 6.1 Rule 6.1 Pro Bono
Public Service
- 6.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 6.1:200
Lawyer's Moral Obligation to Engage in Public Interest Legal Service
- 6.2 Rule 6.2 Accepting
Appointments
- 6.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 6.2:200
Duty to Accept Court Appointments Except for Good Cause
- 6.3 Rule 6.3 Membership
in Legal Services Organization
- 6.3:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 6.3:200
Conflicts of Interest of Lawyers Participating in a Legal Services Organization
- 6.4 Rule 6.4 Law Reform
Activities Affecting Client Interests
- 6.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 6.4:200
Conflicts of Interest of Lawyers Participating in Law Reform Organizations
- 6.5 Rule 6.5 Nonprofit
and Court-Annexed Limited Legal Service Programs
- 6.5:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 6.5:200
Exception to Conflict Rules for Limited Pro-Bono Legal Services
VII. INFORMATION
ABOUT LEGAL SERVICES
- 7.1 Rule 7.1 Communications
Concerning a Lawyer's Services
- 7.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 7.1:200
Lawyer Advertising--In General
- 7.2 Rule 7.2 Advertising
and Recommendation of Professional Employment
- 7.2:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 7.2:200
Permissible Forms of Lawyer Advertising
- 7.2:300
Retaining Copy of Advertising Material
- 7.2:400
Paying to Have Services Recommended
- 7.2:500
Identification of a Responsible Lawyer
- 7.2:600 Advertising for Matters to be Referred
- 7.3 Rule 7.3 Direct
Contact with Prospective Client
- 7.3:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 7.3:200
Prohibition of For-Profit In-Person, Live Telephone, and Real-Time Electronic Solicitation
- 7.3:300
Prohibitions Applicable to All Forms of Solicitation
- 7.3:400
Additional Requirements for Targeted Written, Recorded, and Electronic Solicitation
- 7.3:500
Solicitation by Prepaid and Group Legal Services Plans
- 7.4 Rule 7.4 Communication
of Fields of Practice and Specialization
- 7.4:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 7.4:200
Regulation of Claims of Certification and Specialization
- 7.5 Rule 7.5 Firm Names
and Letterheads
- 7.5:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 7.5:200
Firm Names and Trade Names
- 7.5:300
Law Firms with Offices in More Than One Jurisdiction
- 7.5:400
Use of the Name of a Public Official
- 7.5:500
Misleading Designation as Partnership, etc.
- 7.6 Rule 7.6 Political Contributions to Obtain Government Engagements or Appointments by Judges
- 7.6:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 7.6:200
The "Pay-to-Play" Prohibition
VIII. MAINTAINING
THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROFESSION
- 8.1 Rule 8.1 Bar Admission
and Disciplinary Matters
- 8.1:100
Comparative Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 8.1:200
Bar Admission
- 8.1:300
False Statement of Material Fact in Connection with Admission or Discipline
- 8.1:400
Duty to Respond to Demand for Information
- 8.2 Rule 8.2 Judicial
and Legal Officials
- 8.2:100 Comparative
Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 8.2:200 False Statements About Judges or Candidates for Judicial Office
- 8.2:300 Lawyer
Candidates for Judicial Office
- 8.3 Rule 8.3 Reporting
Professional Misconduct
- 8.3:100 Comparative
Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 8.3:200 Mandatory
Duty to Report Serious Misconduct
- 8.3:300 Reporting
the Serious Misconduct of a Judge
- 8.3:400 Exception
Protecting Confidential Information
- 8.4 Rule 8.4 Misconduct
- 8.4:100 Comparative
Analysis of Ohio Rule
- 8.4:200 Violation
of a Rule of Professional Conduct
- 8.4:300 Commission of an Illegal Act Reflecting Adversely on Honesty or Trustworthiness
- 8.4:400 Dishonesty,
Fraud, Deceit and Misrepresentation
- 8.4:500 Conduct
Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice
- 8.4:600 Implying
Ability to Influence Public Officials
- 8.4:700 Assisting
Judge or Official in Violation of Duty
- 8.4:800 Discrimination
in the Practice of Law
- 8.4:900 Threatening
Prosecution [see section 1.2:900]
- 8.4:1000 Conduct That Adversely Reflects on Fitness to Practice Law
- 8.5 Rule 8.5 Disciplinary
Authority; Choice of Law