| Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
(No. 21)
383 F.2d 988, reversed and remanded. |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Syllabus
| Opinion
[ Fortas ] | Concurrence
[ Stewart ] | Concurrence
[ White ] | Dissent
[ Black ] | Dissent
[ Harlan ] |
| HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
MR. JUSTICE WHITE, concurring.
While I join the Court's opinion, I deem it appropriate to note, first, that the Court continues to recognize a distinction between communicating by words and communicating by acts or conduct which sufficiently impinges on some valid state interest; and, second, that I do not subscribe to everything the Court of Appeals said about free speech in its opinion in Burnside v. Byars, 363 F.2d 744, 748 (C.A. 5th Cir.1966), a case relied upon by the Court in the matter now before us.