Case Status

13 results

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 04/26/99
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and expenses is granted and it is ordered that the River Master is awarded a total of $2,505.00 for the period January 1 — March 31, 1999, to be paid equally by the parties

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/05/98
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $4,054.58 for the period April 1 — June 30, 1998, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/12/99
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted and the River Master is awarded a total of $3,189.83 for the period April 1, 1999 — June 30, 1999, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 06/05/00
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $2,439.00 for the period January 1 - March 31, 2000, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/10/00
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for approval of fees and expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $2,885.93 for the period April 1, 2000 — June 30, 2000, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 06/29/01
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and expenses is granted, and the River Master is granted a total of $2,645.00 for the period January 1 — March 31, 2001, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/15/01
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted and the River Master is awarded a total of $2,970.18 for the period April 1, 2001 — June 30, 2001, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/07/02
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $5,820.53 for the period January 1, 2002, through June 30, 2002, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 06/16/03
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $7,172.37 for the period January 1, 2003, through March 31, 2003.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/20/03
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $3,351.04 for the period April 1, 2003, through July 31, 2003, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/04/04
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motions of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses are granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $2,516.00 for the period January 1, 2004, through March 31, 2004, and a total of $2,452.38 for the period April 1, 2004, through June 30, 2004.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 05/31/05
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of River Master for fees and expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $2,712.00 for the period January 1, 2005, through March 31, 2005, to be paid equally by the parties.

TEXAS v. NEW MEXICO (2617)

    Order dated: 10/03/05
    Docket number: 65ORIG
    Action:
        The motion of the River Master for fees and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the River Master is awarded a total of $4,750.22 for the period April 1, 2005, through June 30, 2005, to be paid equally by the parties. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.