Syllabus
|
Opinion
[Stevens] |
Concurrence
[Scalia] |
Concurrence
[Souter] |
Dissent
[Thomas] |
Dissent
[Alito] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version | HTML version
PDF version |
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
BRIAN MICHAEL GALL, PETITIONER v.
UNITED STATES
on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit
[December 10, 2007]
Justice Thomas, dissenting.
Consistent with my dissenting opinion in Kimbrough v. United States, post, p. ___, I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals because the District Court committed statutory error when it departed below the applicable Guidelines range.